Wednesday, May 11, 2011

Linux Mint 11 "Katya" Review

The wait was finally over for the many Linux Mint fans who wanted R11 to become available when the release candidate was made public just a few days ago. For those who don't remember or didn't know, Linux Mint 10 RC went live soon after Ubuntu 10.10, but then it took quite a while for the final official version to be available. Users with the RC would get all the updates required and would eventually be at the same level as the final release version. Long story short, if you can't wait to get your hands on Linux Mint 11, there's no real need to wait for the final version to be available.

Please note that early download/upgrade/installation is not recommended for users who require a very stable environment. Such users are better off waiting a few more months before actually downloading or maybe even skipping the upgrade altogether.


This review of Linux Mint is a bit special in that it will be a lot shorter than usual. The guys behind Mint have again done a great job summarizing everything that is new in this latest release, including relevant screenshots for new applications and features, as well as thorough descriptions of changes, known bugs, upstream dependencies, etc.

As I was taking my own screenshots and putting together the material for this review, I noticed how terribly redundant a lot of it was when compared with that official Linux Mint 11 feature list, so I decided to bound my review to my own experience and opinion, leaving the "facts" to them. Therefore, before you continue reading, I strongly recommend checking out the Linux Mint 11 official WHAT'S NEW page. It will help you understand Linux Mint 11 better, as well as give you a solid background to follow this review.

You may also find it useful to read my Linux Mint 10 REVIEW, which is still relevant because many areas have not changed much in these past six months.


The Ubuntu influence is once more evident in the installation process, but in a good way, as is often the case. The carefully put together Mint branding adds an elegant touch while green tones take over from purple and orange. As usual, installation went by pretty quickly and worked out perfectly. It is a very solid and well-designed feature at this stage.

When Clement Lefebvre first ANNOUNCED that Mint 11 would not use GNOME Shell nor Unity, but still be based on Classic GNOME 3, a lot of us smiled and nodded in approval. Judging by the early demonstrations of GNOME Shell and Unity, neither of them looked a viable route, but incorporating the latest from GNOME inside the classic interface we all knew and loved felt like a great idea.

Unfortunately, that idea was short lived, for Katya is actually based on GNOME 2.32, just like Natty Narwhal. Not necessarily a bad thing, though, and it may prove instrumental in taking Linux Mint popularity to new heights as Ubuntu users who are not happy with Unity look elsewhere for an alternative. I must admit it was a bit of a disappointment for me, though. On the one hand I think it is good that they bet on stability and continuity, but on the other hand, particularly after testing Ubuntu 11.04 and Fedora 15, Linux Mint 11 changes feel not that exciting.

It couldn't be any other way, though: I like many things about this latest release, the Update and Software Manager new features being right at the top of my list. Indeed, the Software Manager has improved considerably in terms of Look&Feel and a more intuitive, informative and interactive interface. Have you used Apple's App Store? Well, I like this one better in many ways, that's how good it is. The Update Manager has also become sleeker and faster (a much needed improvement), and has at last received a fix to the unresolved dependencies problem it suffered from for some time now.

As is always the case with each new release, there are some Artwork enhancements. Katya includes a wide selection of high quality wallpapers, some minor updates to Mint-X icon and GTK themes, as well as the sometimes controversial new Ubuntu overlay scrollbars. Nothing revolutionary, but still nice.

In terms of application catalog, there are some interesting changes, most notably the switch from OpenOffice to LibreOffice, RhythmBox to Banshee, F-Spot to gThumb and the removal of Gwibber from the default image. Again, nothing groundbreaking here, but I particularly appreciate that Mint developers are listening to their user community and shaping new releases according to the feedback they receive.

Other minor changes include the ability to download a LiveCD image and then easily upgrade to the LiveDVD version. I am not so sure about this one, to be honest... Considering the upgrade to the LiveDVD version implies download and installation time, why would anybody interested in having those features download the LiveCD version in the first place? I am sure it will be a welcome feature for some, though, but I find it somewhat useless myself.

Classic Mint features like the Mint Menu are very much alive and return unchanged. No shame in that, really, for Mint Menu already covers most of the ground a menu can cover anyway. I personally would only change its behaviour when scrolling through application category entries, which sometimes feels inconsistent and ends up becoming annoying.


After testing Linux Mint 11, one word comes to mind: Continuity. Katya does include several new features and enhancements which improve the product further, no doubt about it, but are they enough for Linux Mint 10 users to dump their current installation and upgrade? I personally don't think so.

I currently have Linux Mint 10 installed in one of my machines and it will stay there for another good six months, at least. I don't use the Software Manager that much, so I wouldn't gain much from its new features and other minor changes like Artwork and Application selection I could get manually anyway if I wanted to. Others may have different needs or may want to try Mint for the first time, and I would definitely encourage them all to go for it, but if you are currently happy with Linux Mint 10, you might be better off sticking to it for a while longer.


  1. I'm a bit disappointed that Linux Mint is not being a little more adventurous. I know that they want to maintain continuity but I think that it is a backward step to stay with an old version of Gnome. Ultimately I think that they should move to KDE as their main desktop, Linux Mint has always been about providing a simple elegant DE and I think that KDE 4.6 is closer to that than the new directions taken by Gnome 3 and unity.

    Thanks for the blog Chema. I loved your moving from Ubuntu to Fedora post. How about the same type of post from ubuntu to opensuse?

  2. Thanks for your comments... About a post about moving to OpenSuse, I am not sure. If you read my recent 11.4 review, I was a bit disappointed, so I don't think I would recommend it.

  3. There appear to be some improvements beneath the hood. Mint 11 recognises my Samsung ML-1665 printer immediately now, and certain games work better than they used to.

  4. "Ultimately I think that they should move to KDE as their main desktop"
    - i dont quite agree with you here. Mint KDE has earned a lot of ire for including a lot of GTK and QT applications instead of KDE apps. If they move to KDE, they better change their base to OpenSUSE, 'cause Kubuntu is also a mediocre distro at best.

  5. I personally feel that both GNOME Shell and Unity, with all their current flaws and limitations, are better choices than KDE looking forward. KDE is slowly becoming more solid and better performing, but it is happening way too slow... It's almost 3 years since KDE 4 series went live!...

    On top of that, KDE invests time and resources in developing a classic desktop that was more of a paradigm from the nineties. I believe that people are getting lots of exposure to interfaces that require very little effort to learn, yet they offer 80%-90% of the functionality the average Joe would get from a classic desktop interface. If the massive success of those interfaces means anything is that people definitely choose ease of use and intuitiveness over functionality and power. Unity and GNOME Shell are steps in that direction, perhaps watering down the amount of options available, but offering environments that are solid, easy to use and fully functional right off the bat (I know, Unity is still not entirely there yet, but it will be).

  6. The review is pretty great. But could have been updated. I am using linux mint for 2 years. And i dont think Katya is as good as say, julia.

    Too many bugs. I have listed the once i have noted.
    1. Drag a window to the top and it gets automatically maximized - works with unity's universal title bar but is out of place here.
    2. When watching a video double click it to get full screen- do this repeatedly the window goes to the next workspace.
    3. No plymouth boot screen- that is an error.

    If i could get the newer kernel, the artwork and the libre office in julia then i'll use it forever.

  7. I just installed linux mint 11 as a duelboot with abuntu 11.04, which i used to replace mint 10, and i gotta say, some good changes were in there, good ones indeed. Great review man, keep up the good work!

  8. I just installed Mint 11 & although very pleased with the clean look & feel
    (nice enhancements) as well as the package selections, but...
    I'm disappointed with the flaws in graphics performance and presumably bugs with jumpy screen refreshes.
    Mint 10 worked flawlessly...why change something that works well, unless the "new" works 100%? My overall reaction - a bit disappointed!

  9. Mint is definitely snappier than ubuntu. Be interesting going forward.

  10. I've just tried Linux Mint 11, but sadly, it will force you to replace the Windows XP loader with GRUB as the primary boot loader in order to dual-boot Windows XP and Linux Mint. In other linux distros, you still have the option to dual-boot them with Windows XP without the need to replace the NT loader with GRUB. For me, opensuse is still much better and have more features than Linux Mint 11. Also, opensuse have a feature to restore the master boot record of the hard disk which is lacking in Linux Mint 11. I was able to dual-boot my Windows XP with opensuse by using the NT loader to boot opensuse and no third-party software was used here. I simply created a back-up of my opensuse's grub loader and created an entry in the boot.ini file to load it and it worked. The primary boot loader is still my Windows XP boot loader. In Linux Mint 11, this technique is not applicable. So, I dumped Linux Mint 11 and used opensuse 11.4 instead.

  11. First of all... @ the other Anonymous: Grub is far better and more reliable than NT loader. You can easily keep your NT loader intact just by installing to separate physical disks (on 2 hard drives), but why would you need Window$ once you discover Linux is a mystery to me...
    As far as Mint 11... to many bugs and "known issues" from both upstream and Mint itself. Hope they will do a better job with Mint 12. For now Mint 10 is OK but the Mint LTS 9 is still the best.